Main Actions of the Quality Assurance System
The Quality Assurance System at Tempulli College is built in accordance with national and international standards, ensuring high academic and administrative quality, transparency, and continuous improvement.
Quality Assurance Supported by Regulations
All quality assurance procedures, processes, and responsibilities are implemented based on:
-
The Regulation on Internal Quality Assurance
-
The Quality Assurance Calendar
-
The Quality Assurance Manual
These documents define:
-
the structure of the quality assurance system,
-
evaluation mechanisms,
-
roles and responsibilities,
-
monitoring and reporting procedures.
1. Organization of Institutional Meetings and Discussions
The institution organizes regular meetings with academic and administrative staff, where quality standards, evaluation procedures, and the interpretation of evaluation results are discussed.
2. Involvement of Academic Staff in Professional Development
Academic staff actively participate in workshops, trainings, and activities aimed at analyzing the quality assurance system and exchanging national and international experiences and best practices.
3. Periodic Quality Evaluation and Continuous Improvement
The quality of the institution, study programs, teaching process, and staff performance is evaluated regularly, while the results are used for planning and implementing improvement measures.
4. Analysis of Recruitment Policies and Strategic Orientation
The institution continuously analyzes labor market needs, institutional capacities, and strategic plans, ensuring that recruitment policies are aligned with developments in the economy, industry, and community.
5. Continuous Information on Evaluation Rules and Procedures
All participants involved in the evaluation process are informed in advance about the criteria and procedures, ensuring transparency, fairness, and equal treatment throughout the process.
Quality Assurance Results
General Results
The general results of quality assurance processes (annual analyses, institutional summaries, and evaluation statistics) are published in SEMS after processing and approval by the relevant institutional bodies. These results are accessible to students and professors.
The published results serve to:
-
identify areas for improvement,
-
support the development of strategic plans,
-
increase institutional transparency,
-
inform the academic community and institutional partners.
General Reports
-
Student Evaluation of Teaching and Learning, Administration, Services, and Infrastructure 2023–2024
-
Student Evaluation of Teaching and Learning, Administration, Services, and Infrastructure 2024–2025
-
Evaluation of Infrastructure and Administrative Staff by Academic Staff 2023–2024
-
Evaluation of Infrastructure and Administrative Staff by Academic Staff 2024–2025
-
Alumni Evaluation 2025
-
Business Evaluation of Graduates 2025
Individual Student Evaluation Reports by Course and Professor According to Generations (Access through SEMS)
Generation 2022–2023
-
First Year
-
Second Year
-
Third Year
Generation 2023–2024
Generation 2024–2025
Generation 2025–2026
General Student Evaluation Reports by Course and Professor According to Generations
General report of the students evaluation for academic staff 2023-2024
General report of the students evaluation for academic staff 2024-2025
Individual Evaluation Results
To protect academic integrity, personal data, and institutional confidentiality:
-
Individual academic staff evaluation results are sent directly to each lecturer’s official email address.
-
Individual results are accessible only through the SEMS platform by students and professors.
-
Peer evaluation and management evaluation results are sent directly to professors by the coordinator, followed by the preparation of an individual improvement plan.
-
Results of the Institutional Evaluation by Administrative Staff are published through the SEMS platform.
-
Alumni evaluations will be conducted for the first time this year, and the results will be accessible through SEMS.
For these reasons, individual evaluation results are not publicly available, fully respecting standards of privacy, professional ethics, local institutional culture, and data protection policies.